Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: challenge for Russian Corporate Governance

Sarbanes-Oxley Links IT to Corporate Compliance

In the wake of financial frauds and related audit issues, the US Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley (SARBOX) Act of 2002. Key to becoming SARBOX compliant are information systems (IS) that satisfy the mandates regarding internal controls, corporate governance, and fraud detection. These legal developments focusing senior management's attention on (1) internal controls are present and functionin...

Was the Sarbanes-Oxley Act good news for corporate bondholders?

This study examines the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) on bondholders, a significant investor group that has not been previously considered in the SOX literature. We find that bond values decline around the announcement of events leading up to the passage of SOX, consistent with market participants expecting SOX to impose net costs on bondholders. We further find that the decline in bon...

Capital Structure , Corporate Governance , and the Effect of Sarbanes - Oxley

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act represented a major legislative action designed to increase transparency and accountability in U.S. corporations. Within the context of agency theory and corporate governance, the expectation is that the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley impacted the agency relationship of firms and hence affected the corporate governance structure. With these changes, the question arises as to...

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance

Holistic Compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley

The theory underlying US securities laws is that investors are helpless without reliable information [Zelizer, 2002]. When Enron's collapse and other corporate frauds made it clear that "practically every element of our system of safeguards failed until it was too late to repair the damage," Congress reinforced those laws by passing the Sarbanes-Oxley (SARBOX) Act [O'Malley, 2002]. This new law...